My God Evolves.

God was once an architect, then a legislator, then a poet. Now, perhaps, a malfunctioning algorithm. Or maybe, as Terry Eagleton once said, “God does not exist, but He is no mere fiction.” Maybe God is a draft, constantly revised, never quite finished.


Or maybe He is a revolution, not a ruler.


For centuries, God was sovereignty a king in the sky, a divine right to rule, the scaffolding for power structures that held civilization together. From Augustine’s City of God to Hobbes’ Leviathan, belief was order, and order was control. But then came the cracks Nietzsche’s hammer, Marx’s dialectic, Freud’s subconscious. God fell, or rather, was dethroned. The churches stood, but the world turned secular, modern, digital, postmodern.


Yet, even in His absence, He evolved.


Now, we no longer argue whether He exists. We argue over His function.


If capitalism had a God, it would be a stock market ticker divine providence reduced to profit margins. If democracy had a God, it would be the ballot box a deity that speaks in majorities, changes every election cycle. If AI had a God, it would be an evolving neural network an intelligence that learns, adapts, and writes new scriptures in lines of code.


But where does that leave us?


Terry Eagleton writes, “We are at the mercy of meanings we cannot control.” But what if God is the meaning we constantly rewrite? What if, instead of being a fixed entity, God is a dialectic moving between the thesis of faith and the antithesis of reason, waiting for synthesis in something we have not yet imagined?


The Political God


In medieval Europe, God legitimized power. Now, He legitimizes ideology. The Right weaponizes faith, the Left deconstructs it. Liberation theology fights capitalism, while megachurches baptize it. The idea of God is no longer about existence it’s about political function.


Slavoj Žižek calls this the “God that must exist.” Not because He is real, but because without Him, something breaks an ethical void, a narrative crisis, a loss of meaning that ideology cannot fully replace. We keep reinventing God because we need an ultimate reference point, even as we try to kill Him.


Hannah Arendt argued that the death of God left us with totalitarian ideologies fascism, communism systems that filled the void of meaning. If God is history, then His absence is a historical vacuum, and that vacuum demands to be filled.




God as History


Walter Benjamin, in his famous "Theses on the Philosophy of History," described history as a wreckage piling up, pushed by the storm of progress. If history is accumulation, then so is God. He is not static but a palimpsest rewritten by every era, every civilization, every collapse.

The greeks had Zeus, the Romans had Jupiter, the Hindus had Brahman, the Buddhists had emptiness, the Enlightenment had reason, the 21st century has data. Each era constructs its own divinity a reflection of its fears, its ambitions, its contradictions.

But history, like God, is not linear. It is cyclical, paradoxical, recursive.

If God was an ancient lawgiver, then the Renaissance made Him an artist. If He was a ruler in the Middle Ages, then the Enlightenment made Him a watchmaker. If the 20th century declared Him dead, then the 21st century resurrected Him in algorithms.


God as Mathematics


Mathematics is not about numbers, but about patterns. And God, if He exists at all, is a pattern, a set of infinite possibilities collapsing into one reality.


Leibniz believed that God was a mathematician, the universe a vast equation. Gödel, the logician, suggested that even mathematics has incompleteness that there will always be truths that cannot be proven.


Does that mean God Himself is incomplete? If God is evolving, is He an unsolved theorem?


We often say, “God is in the details.” But maybe God is in the paradoxes.


Cantor's infinity theory suggests that some infinities are bigger than others. If God is infinite, then is He just a larger infinity, an unknowable equation, a fractal of divinity repeating itself at different scales?


Mathematics suggests a God of structure one who speaks in the language of symmetry, primes, Fibonacci sequences. But quantum physics suggests a God of uncertainty one who exists in probabilities, collapses into existence only when observed.


What if God is both?


The Paradox of Faith in an Evolving God


If God evolves, then faith cannot be absolute. But if faith is not absolute, is it still faith? This is the paradox. A God who evolves means a God who is not yet complete. A God who is learning, shifting, questioning like us. A God who doubts.


Søren Kierkegaard once said, “To have faith is to lose your mind and win God.” But what if faith is to lose certainty and win possibility? What if believing in an evolving God means believing in the unknown, in the future, in the unfinished manuscript of existence?


Perhaps the ultimate act of faith is to accept that God, like history, like mathematics, like politics, like truth is unfinished.


A draft. A revolution. A paradox.


Written by

Vaibhav Upadhyay. 

Happy Holi ( enjway✨️😁absolute blast)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FOUR MORE HISTORICAL SHOTS.

Image
A Journey through Modern Historical Non-Fiction: Four Perspectives on India and the World. In the past four months, my intellectual journey has been profoundly enriched by four seminal works of historical non-fiction. Each book, in its own distinctive way, engages with the long arc of India’s history, culture, politics, and place in the global order. Though they differ in style, scope, and sensibility, together they form a powerful mosaic of India’s past, present, and future. Here is a reflection on each. 1 . The Golden Road by William Dalrymple William Dalrymple’s The Golden Road is an exemplary work of historical non-fiction, combining the rigour of archival research with the narrative elegance of a master storyteller. To borrow Maya Jasanoff’s apt description:   Dalrymple researches like a historian, thinks like an anthropologist, and writes like a novelist. In The Golden Road, Dalrymple explores the intricate web of connections that linked India to the wider world...
Read more

WE ARE SO GHIBIL-FIED.

MIYAZAKI, SATIRE, AND THE DEATH OF THE ARTIST. Congratulations, humanity! we have finally outdone ourselves. progress! That magnificent locomotive of human ingenuity, now barrelling toward a future where art is no longer a labor of love, but a neatly arranged sequence of algorithmic probabilities. What a relief! No more agonizing over composition, no more excruciating brushstrokes just cold, unfeeling computation assembling pixels in a manner that pleases the untrained eye . The very essence of efficiency, some might say. But efficiency has never been the bedfellow of beauty. For centuries, art was a dialogue between the creator and the medium, between the work and the world, between the audience and the ineffable. It was an act of defiance against time itself, a refusal to let fleeting moments slip into oblivion without first being rendered in pigment or prose. And now? Now it is a product of mathematical convenience, a lifeless simulacrum that mimics aesthetic grandeur while posses...
Read more
 I’m 20. The Algorithm is Still Loading. I am 20. Suspended between past and future, a half-formed hypothesis waiting for proof. In another decade, I might be a father—wild, isn’t it? The idea that in ten years, I might be the one answering questions instead of asking them. But what do I know? I still haven’t figured out whether I want to be the father or the child. At 10, I had no such existential dilemmas. I was reckless in the best way possible—curious, honest, mischievous. I wasn’t weighed down by overanalysis, responsibility, or the slow realization that time is running out. Fear, then, was simple: the dark corner of my room, the possibility of losing a Pokémon battle, or the thought that the ice cream truck might run out before I got there. Now, fear is abstract, omnipresent. It’s the economy, it’s the job market, it’s am I making the right choices? At 10, I used to sit with my father, running my fingers over geography maps, lost in the wonder of places I had never seen. We t...
Read more